Taking a Step in
the Right Direction
by Joe McTernan, AOPA Government Affairs Department
Last year, AOPA, in conjunction with the O&P Alliance,
met with
representatives from the Statistical Analysis Durable Medical Equipment
Regional Carrier (SADMERC) to discuss a potential overhaul of HCPCS
codes that describe prosthetic feet. One of the goals of the SADMERC is
to reduce the overall number of codes while creating a new code set
that better represents the range of commercially available prosthetic
feet.
Specifically, the SADMERC was looking for contact information for
manufacturers of prosthetic feet so that it could solicit feedback
regarding the proposed code set.
AOPA recognized the outstanding opportunity this project presented and
suggested a slightly different approach. Rather than soliciting
feedback from each manufacturer individually, AOPA suggested that the
SADMERC allow AOPA to moderate a meeting of representatives from all of
the interested prosthetic foot manufacturers. The purpose of this
meeting would be to develop a clinically sound set of codes that
accurately reflects modern prosthetic foot technology.
In addition to the code set, AOPA proposed the development of coding
standards that could be used to test and verify specific
characteristics of prosthetic feet. The SADMERC agreed to this
proposal, and the AOPA prosthetic foot workgroup was created.
The workgroup, chaired by Thomas DiBello, CO, LO, FAAOP, a member of
AOPA’s Coding and Reimbursement Committee, has now met on
five
occasions. It has made significant progress in developing a revised
code set that will meet the needs of the SADMERC, while at the same
time accommodating existing products available in the marketplace. The
philosophy behind the proposed code set also encourages continued
research and development of new and innovative products.
The workgroup has focused on the functional characteristics of
prosthetic feet in creating code language that is easy to understand.
At the same time, the code set is split into “base”
addition codes that describe functional characteristics of both the
keel and heel section of the foot, and “feature”
addition
codes that describe unique functional characteristics of the foot.
Various combinations of these base and feature codes allow prosthetic
practitioners to describe the function of the prosthetic foot that best
meets the needs of their individual patient.
In addition to creating a proposed code set for prosthetic feet, the
workgroup is also developing testing standards that will clearly define
what thresholds must be met in order for a prosthetic foot to be
described by a specific code. Currently, there is no way to objectively
determine whether a particular prosthetic foot meets the functional
requirements of a code. One goal of the workgroup is to create simple,
repeatable tests that can be used to verify the functional
characteristics of a prosthetic foot.
One of the highlights of the project so far is the high level of
cooperation that exists among the manufacturer representatives present
at the meetings. With more than ten different prosthetic foot
manufacturers represented, each with their own individual interests,
their ability to work toward a goal that will benefit the O&P
community as a whole has been remarkable. Without this unprecedented
level of professionalism and commitment to the successful outcome, the
workgroup would not have accomplished as much as it has.
In March 2008, AOPA representatives met with the SADMERC to present a
preliminary report on the progress of the workgroup. This meeting went
very well and the SADMERC expressed its support for the workgroup to
continue. The workgroup expects to present its complete proposal to the
SADMERC in time for inclusion in the 2009 HCPCS update.
If time constraints do not allow this to occur, the SADMERC has the
authority to establish temporary “K” codes at any
time
during the year. The workgroup is hopeful that the final proposed code
set will be accepted and implemented during 2009.
While there is no guarantee that what is eventually provided to the
SADMERC will be accepted in full, AOPA is encouraged by the reception
our interim proposal received. In addition, if this effort is
successful, it will provide us with a template for moving forward on
other sections of the HCPCS L codes, since the SADMERC has indicated
that it wishes to revise the whole code set over the next several years.
Joe McTernan is director
of reimbursement services for AOPA. Questions? Call (571) 431-0876,
ext. 211, or e-mail
jmcternan@AOPAnet.org.