DMEPOS Enrollment vs. Accreditation:
Is There a Difference?
By Brian Banks
There has been some confusion over whether DMEPOS enrollment is
different from CMS accreditation. If a facility is enrolling as a
DMEPOS supplier, does it need to go through the accreditation process
too? Does accreditation have to happen before enrollment? Will there be
one or two site visits?
The two processes are separate, and it’s important for suppliers to understand the differences.
The standards are different
First, DMEPOS supplier standards and Medicare Quality Standards are two
separate sets of standards. Each set of standards relates to different
aspects of a supplier’s business. Therefore, the two processes
are not interchangeable.
Second, two different groups are responsible for ensuring compliance
with the two different sets of standards. The National Supplier
Clearinghouse (NSC) is responsible for ensuring suppliers are in
compliance with the DMEPOS supplier standards. The accrediting
organizations appointed by CMS (such as ABC and BOC) are responsible
for ensuring suppliers meet the Medicare Quality Standards.
Since the two processes and sets of standards are different, being in
compliance with one set of standards does not ensure compliance with
the other. A supplier’s accreditation does not automatically mean
it has met the requirements to bill Medicare as a DMEPOS supplier.
What about site visits?
Suppliers are also confused about the number of site visits
they’ll receive. Both the NSC and the accrediting organizations
will conduct site visits or surveys to determine a supplier’s
compliance with the set of standards each entity is responsible for
enforcing. Therefore, suppliers can expect to receive a site visit or
survey from both the NSC and an accrediting organization to verify
compliance with their respective sets of standards.
The NSC’s role
Some of the confusion comes from the fact that the NSC is involved in
the quality standards accreditation process. But the NSC’s
involvement in the accreditation process is limited to ensuring
suppliers are properly accredited to provide the products and services
listed on the supplier file, and collecting and maintaining information
regarding supplier accreditation.
What makes this even more confusing is that CMS has yet to establish a
date when all suppliers must be accredited. Therefore, suppliers are
not currently required to provide the NSC with their accreditation
information or complete Section 2F of the CMS 855S application form.
The NSC will inform suppliers when this information is required.
Please note, suppliers who are planning to participate in the first
round of the competitive bidding process must be accredited or be
pending accreditation to submit a bid. Also, suppliers must be
accredited to be awarded a contract. The accreditation deadline for the
first round of competitive bidding is October 31, 2007.
The different responsibilities
Below is a breakdown of each entity’s responsibilities, which
should help clarify the differences between the two processes.
The NSC is responsible for:
Accrediting organizations are responsible for:
Keep them separate
To reiterate: the NSC and accrediting organizations are enforcing two
different sets of standards. Being in compliance with one set does not
mean the supplier is in compliance with the other.
For more information regarding the DMEPOS enrollment process, please
contact the NSC Customer Service Line at (866) 238-9652 or visit the
NSC Web site (www.PalmettoGBA.com/NSC).
For more information regarding the accreditation process and the quality standards, please visit www.cms.hhs.gov/CompetitiveAcqforDMEPOS on the CMS Web site.
Brian Banks is NSC Ombudsman at Palmetto GBA.