by Deborah Conn
It’s getting crowded out there. The world of O&P care is
populated not just with certified practitioners and accredited
facilities, but with a host of other professionals—therapists,
pharmacists, athletic trainers, physician assistants—who are
providing orthotic or prosthetic services.
How can you, as a trained and qualified practitioner, distinguish your
services and expertise from others who are providing similar
services?
Accreditation still stands out
For many years, accreditation has been the way for facilities to demonstrate their ability to provide superior care.
“This has been a voluntary process,” explains Cathy Carter,
executive director of the American Board for Certification in
Orthotics, Prosthetics, and Pedorthics (ABC), an accrediting body.
“People enter into it if they want to show their patients,
third-party payers, and referral sources that they meet what we call
the gold standard: the profession’s self-set, highest
standards.”
“We want to [draw] a road map for the efficient management of an
O&P facility,” says Scott Williamson, ABC’s director
for facility accreditation. To gain the ABC stamp of approval,
facilities must comply with standards that encompass facility safety,
supplier compliance, and organizational structure. But the main
emphasis, Williamson says, is on patient management: the appropriate
care of O&P patients.
The first step in gaining ABC accreditation is to submit an
application, which is followed by an on-site evaluation by a trained
ABC surveyor. Williamson believes that survey is part of what
distinguishes ABC accreditation. “Our surveyors are O&P
certified practitioners—they’ve been through it,” he
says. “And our process is consultative. We get continual feedback
that the on-site survey is an invaluable component of the
process.”
Tom Derrick, director of public relations, marketing, and professional
discipline for ABC, agrees. “We have a tremendous amount of
information to convey to practice managers and organizations to achieve
accreditation,” he says. “We also believe in providing
affordable accreditation.”
The Board for Orthotist/Prosthetist Certification (BOC) also requires
facilities to submit a comprehensive application, which is followed by
an unannounced site survey. Jim Newberry, BOCPO, LPO, past interim
executive director of BOC, explains that in most cases, facilities that
come up short will have an opportunity to correct deficiencies to gain
BOC accreditation.
CMS complicates the scene
These voluntary accreditation programs have been in place for decades.
But, says Carter, “the facility accreditation world has changed
dramatically since CMS [the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services]
got into the accreditation business.” Last August, CMS named 11
organizations (now 10, after ABC and BCP integrated) that would have
the authority to accredit providers of durable medical equipment,
prosthetics, orthotics, and supplies (DMEPOS). (See sidebar on page
54). Once CMS determines a deadline, providers must be accredited by
one of these entities to bill CMS for services by that date.
The list of accrediting bodies includes ABC and BOC, as well as eight
other groups, most of which, says Williamson, have no experience
accrediting prosthetics and orthotics. “Many are used to doing
DME, and there’s a huge difference between setting up an oxygen
concentrator and a computerized knee,” he says. “O&P
requires far more patient management.”
Peter Thomas, Esq., is general counsel for the National Association for
the Advancement of Orthotics and Prosthetics (NAAOP). “This is a
big step up for DME,” he says, “because they had no
accreditation at all, except in the area of high-end rehab wheelchairs.
But the O&P field has had a well-defined accreditation pathway
since the 1940s. The impact on O&P may be the opposite of what was
intended; it may embolden a lot of suppliers to get the
government’s seal of approval to bill under the O&P fee
schedule and start billing O&P just because they can.”
Derrick notes, “A few of the groups were established for the
express purpose of becoming a CMS-deemed accrediting body—to make
money. Unlike ABC, which has always been non-profit, a number of the
approved groups are of a private, for-profit nature.”
“We are happy CMS is supporting accreditation,” says Kathy
Dodson, senior director of government affairs at AOPA, “but we
don’t think they have been appropriately selective as to who is
qualified to accredit facilities.”
Weakening accreditation’s impact
The problem, says BOC’s Jim Newberry, “is that CMS is diluting ABC and BOC accreditation.”
“It will be harder for ABC to stand out from nine other
agencies,” agrees Cathy Carter. “Insurers will care that a
facility is accredited, but they may not care by whom.
“ABC-accredited facilities will have to show stakeholders that
they are accredited by an organization with a long history of
accrediting P&O and [with] time-tested standards, specific to
P&O patient care, that distinguish our program from the
others.”
Derrick notes that many insurance companies already require ABC
accreditation. “Blue Cross/Blue Shield in Michigan, Tennessee,
and North Carolina require that facilities in their provider networks
be ABC-accredited,” he says, “and we are working to expand
that to other states.”
The O&P Alliance, which comprises NAAOP, ABC, the American Academy
of Orthotists and Prosthetists (AAOP) and AOPA, is engaged in ongoing
discussions with CMS in an effort, says NAAOP counsel Thomas, “to
get them to do the right thing and protect beneficiaries.”
Licensure: a possible solution?
Licensure is another tool that may—or may not—help O&P
professionals stand out in the crowd. Licensure efforts are underway in
a number of states, and at press time, 12 states had passed legislation
establishing O&P licensing boards and standards.
O&P practitioners are divided on the benefits of licensure.
“It is another way to distinguish ourselves as experts,”
says BOC’s Newberry. “But it can be expensive.”
“That’s one of the negatives,” agrees Anita
Liberman-Lampear, director of the University of Michigan Orthotics and
Prosthetics Center. “You have to raise a lot of money to get the
bill through the state legislature, and then the state has to fund its
operation.” Typically, practitioners must pay steep annual fees
to maintain their licenses.
Anthony Filippis, CPO, president of Wright & Filippis in Rochester
Hills, Mich., believes that the issue of licensure is looming because
practitioners dropped the ball. “If we had done our due diligence
nationally, working with payers to educate them on the importance of
facility accreditation and certification, we would not be having this
debate now.”
According to Filippis, ABC-certified practitioners went to large payers
in Michigan—such as state employees and retired teachers—in
the 1970s to make the case for ABC certification. Today, both Blue
Cross/Blue Shield and Medicaid require ABC certification before they
will reimburse for certain L codes.
Would licensure help set practitioners apart? “If licensure is
required,” says Filippis. “The intent is to even the field.
At first, anyone out there who is practicing today could get licensed;
otherwise you couldn’t get lawmakers to pass the legislation. So
it wouldn’t help at first, but over the long term, it has the
potential for helping us stand out.”
Marketing makes the difference
Accreditation, certification, licensure—no matter how much these
credentials establish your qualifications, they can’t set you
apart unless you spread the word. Marketing your expertise to referral
sources, third-party payers, and patients is essential if you are to
succeed.
Keith Senn, COO of the Center for O&P Care in Louisville, Ky., has
had a marketing expert on staff for the past three years.
“Our efforts consist mainly of getting to know our referrers
better,” he says. Senn and his staff arrange luncheon visits at
doctors’ and therapists’ offices and hospitals—and
they provide the lunch. “It gives us the chance to talk with the
referrers, explain what we do, and answer any questions they may
have,” he explains. “We find out what’s important to
them.”
The center also has an extensive amputee education program. “We
go into patients’ rooms and sit down and talk with new amputees
about what they can expect. We bring in a lot of literature and help
them connect with amputee support groups such as the ACA. There’s
a lot of help out there, but most people are not aware of it.”
Senn credits his marketing efforts with helping to build a successful
practice, but says marketing cannot stand alone. “You have to
back up what you market with quality providers and quality
service,” he emphasizes.
Networking is also a large part of the marketing strategy of Reynolds
Prosthetics and Orthotics Inc., in Maryville, Tenn. President John
Reynolds, CPO, says, “We are visible in the community. Through
our fitness clinics for amputees, we get a lot of media exposure. We
also support a number of fundraising events related to medical
issues.”
The facility serves as a referral source for PT clinics for the
rehabilitation of amputees and stroke victims, which, says Reynolds, is
a form of marketing as well.
“We really push for a team approach to what we do,” says
Reynolds. “It keeps us out in front of those who [write] the
referrals. But no matter what else you do, you have to provide good
service.”
Find a niche
Rhonda Turner, BOCPO, CFom, of the Prosthetic Center in Houston,
deliberately set out to distinguish her practice from others by
focusing on women. “As a woman-owned business, with two women
practitioners, I wanted to set up a practice that was less clinical and
more comfort-based,” she explains. “We have natural
furniture, waterfalls, many plants, and lots of color, so it’s
definitely not a sterile setting.
“This plays into our marketing efforts as well. We promote
ourselves to women’s care groups. We regularly participate in the
women’s health seminars offered by a local hospital. In our
newsletters, we market specifically to women doctors, and I’m
active among local women in business.
“When I started, we had no women patients. Now about half our
patients are women. We have male technicians and CPOs on staff, too, so
people always have a choice.”
Turner also uses the Internet as a communication and marketing tool.
“We are revamping our Web site, so that doctors as well as
patients will find it useful. We have a back end, where referrers can
chat online with our practitioners. So if doctors have an issue and
want to log on at 2 or 3 in the morning, they can check the status of a
patient or leave an e-mail.
“Like many other practitioners, we try to get to groups for
educational purposes. We’ll talk to amputee groups about what we
do and answer questions, both in English and Spanish because we have
two fluent Spanish speakers on staff. We try to make O&P less
scary, and it has created a lot of good will.”
Seizing every opportunity
When Warren Mays, CPO, president of Artisan Orthotic Prosthetic
Technologies Inc., in Portland, Ore., first created his company’s
Web site, he saw it as a tool to educate patients. “We decided
our audience would be our patients, and we have tried to make it very
informative,” he says. “We explain our services and talk
about our philosophy of doing business, offer patient testimonials, and
provide educational and care and maintenance information that patients
can download and print out.
“We put up the site about a year ago, and we never thought about
it being a sales and marketing tool. But in fact, we have received new
business from our Web site. We’ve included a page where people
can contact us, and we get questions from people all over the
country—even internationally. One of our patients, who found us
through the Web site, drives six hours [each] way to see us.”
Mays uses other marketing tools as well, often with a little twist to
set his practice apart. “We send holiday cards and fruit or candy
to our referral sources at Thanksgiving, rather than waiting for the
December holidays,” he says. “That way we’re not lost
in the onslaught of mail everyone gets at Christmas.”
Artisan sponsors a bicycle racing team, providing jerseys emblazoned
with the company’s name. “We’ve tried to attract some
amputees and brace wearers to the team,” he says, “and we
have people who ride with us who don’t race. One young woman with
a C-Leg regularly rides her bicycle to work, in shorts so that her
prosthesis is visible, wearing an Artisan jersey.”
Mays also believes it’s important to get his name out within the
O&P community. “I have a new patient moving here from
Michigan, who was referred to me by another practitioner who had heard
of me through my work in the field,” he explains.
He co-authored a chapter on prosthetics in the upcoming Orthopedic
Knowledge Update 9 and has worked with other companies in product
development. “Last year I worked with Hope Orthopedic in Orlando
to develop a new TLSO for hospital situations. Now we have an Artisan
TLSO, a system for orthotists to get a brace on a patient as quickly as
possible.
“At the end of the day, you just have to look at things in front
of you and seize on them, take advantage of every opportunity to get
your name out there among patients, referrers and your colleagues in
the industry.”
Quality always stands out
If marketing makes the difference, are accreditation, certification and licensure worth it?
Of course. Sources for the article emphasized that marketing means nothing without the quality to back it up.
“You have to come up with the goods,” Mays says.
“You’re only as good as the last device that goes out your
door. You have to put in the time and energy and focus into each and
every device, because that’s what we are all about.”
| Accrediting Organizations |
CMS has named these organizations as accrediting bodies for DMEPOS suppliers:
|
Deborah Conn is
a freelance writer based in Falls Church, Va.