Latest Blog

AOPA Announces Request for Proposals for O&P Research Grants

WASHINGTON, DC – The American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association (AOPA), in partnership with the Center for O&P Learning & Evidence-Based Practice (COPL), has unveiled its 2016 Requests for Proposals (RFPs) inviting submissions for conducting Orthotic and Prosthetic research. AOPA will be funding up to four pilot grants for amounts up to $15,000 each.

“This RFP represents AOPA’s ongoing commitment to advancing data-driven initiatives in O&P. AOPA has been investing in research in an attempt to advance and develop our evidence base. We chose sixteen high priority O&P topics including an open topic to encourage promising researchers from across the profession to apply,” said James Campbell, PhD, CO, FAAOP,

President of AOPA. The 2016 research topics available for funding include Orthotic Management of Osteoarthritis; Sockets: Methods for Measuring Proper Socket Fit and Alignment; Utilization and comparative effectiveness of TLSO/LSO, among many others.

The full RFP and application can be reviewed online.

Questions? Please contact Lauren Anderson, AOPA’s Manager of Communications, Policy, and
Strategic Initiatives at 571/431-0843 or landerson@aopanet.org

What has Happened with Medicare Amputee Services Since 2010?

What has happened to Medicare’s Spending on Prosthetics since 2010?

AOPA has analyzed the data, and the picture is clear. Medicare spent 15% less in 2014 than in 2010 on prosthetics.

Medicare spending on advanced prosthetics has trended down 41%, while spending on older technologies has trended up almost 50%. Overall spending has decreased by 15% since 2010.2010-2014 medicare data

Year All Prosthetic Spending Year All Prosthetic Spending
2005 $607,797,189 2010 $770,462,739
2006 $628,220,869 2011 $756,265,554
2007 $676,421,628 2012 $710,599,456
2008 $704,604,327 2013 $664,405,441
2009 $753,410,033 2014  $662,585,471

Medicare Spending has INCREASED on antiquated prosthetics and DECREASED on Newer Technologies.

2014 medicare data technolgy

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Total % Change  2010-2014
K3 & K4 Feet $90,386,136 $87,863,510 $80,780,898 $61,078,042 $57,205,529 -41.6%
K1 & K2 Feet $3,123,856 $3,385,101 $3,815,199 $4,540,293 $4,98,3348 49.9%

See a breakdown of the data and more in-depth analyses.

Opportunities for Clinical O&P Research Support from the American Orthotic and Prosthetic Association

The American Orthotic & Prosthetic Association, in partnership with the Center for O&P Learning & Evidence-Based Practice (COPL), is proud to announce a Request for Pilot Grant Proposals in 16 potential areas of orthotic and prosthetic research including an open topic.

There are 16 topics total with a few examples listed below:

  • Orthotic Management of Osteoarthritis
  • Sockets: Methods for Measuring Proper Socket Fit and Alignment
  • Quality of Life, Wellness, Patient Satisfaction and/or Outcomes Studies of Patients Who Have Received O&P Care vs. Those Who Have Not
  • Open Topics – Beyond the Above Priorities, Top Quality Clinical O&P Research Topics Considered
  • See the rest of the topics in the full RFP.

AOPA and COPL will give preference to grants that address evidence-based clinical application in orthotics and prosthetics. Please post this RFP and share it with your colleagues. The deadline for proposals is April 30, 2016.

Read the full eligibility and application process.

Where is CMS Going on Prior Authorization?

AOPA has presented free webinars for members on Prior Authorization on two dates – February 18 and February 25.  AOPA is committing substantial resources to additional education related to Medicare Prior Authorization.  Details of these resources are listed below:

1.       Introductory Webinar: February 18th and 25th 2016-2 separate dates (Available as a recording)
2.       February 2016 Reimbursement Page Article: February 2016
3.       Preparation for Prior Authorization Webinar: March 24th and 31st 2016-2 Separate dates (Register)
4.       AOPA Guide to Prior Authorization (Publication- Includes Policy Review, Documentation Checklist, Resources for Physicians, PA Resubmission strategies): April 2016
5.       Educational Seminar on Prior Authorization (2-3 hour): Add on session to 2016 AOPA Policy Forum

What Happens Next and When on Prior Auth.

CMS has issued a final rule on Prior Auth and it includes O&P, so Prior Auth IS going to be part of your future!  That said, what AOPA is hearing from CMS is a relatively cautious, long-view approach.  We do NOT expect to see any list of P&O codes to be subject to Prior Auth. anytime soon-some folks looked for an O&P list to be published by the end of February—but a delay of 6 months to even 12 months seems much more likely.  Why?  Here are a few reasons: (1) CMS would like to see what happens on the pending LCD before it sets up a full mechanism for O&P Prior Auth. ; (2) CMS sees Prior Auth as something of a franchise—so far, as to power wheel chairs, it has gotten pretty good reviews, and they don’t want to risk moving too fast and getting slammed with bad results; (3) they heard the comments of AOPA, patients, Alliance and others at least as to: (a) not wanting to have Prior Auth result in patient delay in getting their prosthesis, and (b) trying to assure that the system is sufficiently well-designed that folks who receive a Prior Auth. approval are not then subject to any post-payment audits.  When a CMS O&P list does come out, an incremental approach with regional trials is more likely than any immediate national policy.

So, AOPA members have the luxury of some extra time to plan and prepare.  Obviously, while any situation with any government agency must be considered somewhat fluid as people and policies can change, AOPA’s assessment on timing is based on a solid sense of reliability of information we have received, and we are confident that it aligns with current CMS plans and timing.  Take advantage of AOPA’s Prior Auth. education programs.  Whenever Prior Auth. for O&P is implemented it will be all about having your documentation right!

And What is AOPA Advocating Regarding Prior Auth?

CMS finalized late last year a final rule establishing Medicare prior authorization requirements for durable medical equipment, prosthetics, orthotics and supplies (DMEPOS).  In the final rule, CMS included lower limb prosthetic devices as being subject to prior authorization.

  • AOPA is concerned the prior authorization process will delay timely access to prosthetic devices, which are critical to the rehabilitation needs of Medicare beneficiaries, and since the Prior Auth. rule is premised explicitly on the need to control unnecessary or excessive utilization “clearly those classes of devices showing -40+% reduction in utilization since 2010 should not be on the list of codes subject to Prior Auth.” (See the data.)
  • Moreover, AOPA is concerned that the receipt of prior authorization does not guarantee payment or the avoidance of post-payment audits. This process therefore only serves to add Medicare compliance burdens for O&P providers.

Articles Published in the Military Medicine Journal on Cost-Effectiveness of O&P Care, and OTS Orthotics

All AOPA members will be receiving in the mail a copy of the recent Military Medicine SupplementMilitary Medicine is the official journal publication of the Association of Military Surgeons of the United States (AMSUS), and this edition arises in conjunction with the topics covered at the December annual meeting of AMSUS.

There are two articles that are very important to all AOPA members which are included in the edition.  Most members are aware of the Dobson-DaVanzo study on cost-effectiveness, which demonstrates, using four years of Medicare data, that timely O&P intervention saves payers’ money (the study has been a central feature of the www.MobilitySaves.org website, and you may wish to take a look there also).  Dr. Allen Dobson, the author of this research, presented his work at the AMSUS meeting, and the attached manuscript will make this work widely available for citation for use by payers (including both Medicare and private sector providers), and others to show the value of O&P care (page 18).

Secondly, this edition also includes the manuscript developed by a Multi-Disciplinary Task Force headed by John Fisk, M.D., with physician representatives from both physical medicine and rehabilitation, and orthopedic surgery, a physical therapist, and certified O&P professionals around key issues on the orthotic treatment team, distinctions between OTS and customized orthotics, the importance of the orthotist’s notes and records, and other key clinical issues (page 11).  This publication is particularly timely in establishing this valuable consensus viewpoint at a time when orthotic care, and its reimbursement are attracting greater attention and scrutiny.

There are also several reasons why we are especially pleased to see both of these articles appearing in Military Medicine.  This journal is a peer-reviewed medical journal, listed in the Index Medicus, which conveys substantial credibility for these papers, placing it in the top tier for purposes of medical citations, and because of the importance of topics covered in this journal to Congressional Appropriations and Department of Defense matters, Military Medicine is circulated to all Congressional Offices, giving these messages great reach to our lawmakers.

Access the articles online.